otp-56-soth-620x387

Big show this week as Bill and Jeffery question what happens when it’s the process used to create the art that’s interesting, not the result. Also, where do we draw the line between photo manipulation and photo journalism? Plus, questions from the OTP Google+ community and listener-suggested Alec Soth is our Photographer of the Week.

Show Notes

“Ice Cream Cait” by Bill Wadman on Vimeo

The Pen Addict Podcast

Growing Concern that News Photos Are Being Excessively Manipulated – SPIEGEL ONLINE

Hansen’s World Press Winning Photo Not Fake… Just Unbelievable — BagNews

Photo Manipulation on the Fashion Pages – NYTimes.com

Google+ completely redesigned | The Verge

Yahoo revitalizes Flickr with huge images | The Verge

Just Start | Ed Dale’s Blog

Projekt 50 on Behance

This Week’s Sponsors

Shutterstock – Use code ‘PICTURES5‘ for 30% off.

Squarespace – Use the coupon code ‘OFFMYLAWN’ at checkout to save 10% on your order and get a free domain name.

Photographer of the Week

Alec Soth

Magnum Photos Photographer Portfolio

National Portrait Gallery | Feature Photography

Books

Ping-Pong Conversations: Alec Soth with Francesco Zanot

Ryan McGinley: Whistle for the Wind

Tim Walker: Story Teller

“Ice Cream Cait” a short film

Welcome to my first short film, Ice Cream Cait. Hopefully it will be the first of many this summer.

Special thanks to Cait Callahan and Everett Cox for whom this would not have been possible.

“Ice Cream Cait” Vimeo Link

and for the less sophisticated of you: “Ice Cream Cait” YouTube Link

otp-54-clark-620x387

Bill and Jeffery discuss why content is no longer king and how you should focus on making (read: doing) something that’s important to you. Adobe kills individual software licenses. Are they doing the right thing with the new Creative Cloud? Plus, “Tulsa” photographer Larry Clark is our Photographer of the Week.

This Week’s Sponsors
Squarespace - Use the coupon code ‘OFFMYLAWN’ at checkout to save 10% on your order and get a free domain name.

Aeron Chair Cylinder Replacement
A legal victory for ‘appropriation art’ – The Verge
“One For Love, One For Money”
Ron Mart NEC PA271w monitor review
Adobe Creative Cloud
On Taking Pictures – The Good and the Bad of Adobe Creative Cloud

Photographer of the Week
Larry Clark – Wikipedia
LarryClark.com
Tulsa Book Video Walkthrough

Books
Tulsa
Nan Goldin
You and I
David Armstrong: 615 Jefferson Avenue

adobeCreativeCloudAdobe announced today that there will be no future versions of the Creative Suite. CS6 will be the last one. All future versions of their software suite which includes Photoshop, Illustrator, Indesign, Premiere, Flash, Dreamweaver, Audition, and others, will only be available via subscription to what Adobe calls The Creative Cloud for $49/month. There will be no more boxed copy, no CS7.

As one would expect, there has been some outcry on the interwebs because of this policy change. I completely understand the change from Adobe’s point of view. Not only will it make their software more difficult to pirate, but it will also smooth out their revenue stream so they don’t get big bumps when a new version comes down, instead they get a little all the time. It also ensures that all the paying customers (and shouldn’t that be all of them in their mind?) have the latest and greatest version running. The end of compatibility problems. Just like Apple with the iPad, there is no Photoshop CS7, there is only Photoshop CC and you’ll have the latest.

Unless you are a student, or acted like you were one, Adobe software has always been expensive, the top end ‘Master Collection’ costs over two grand. So is $600 a year to get access to all of it really that much worse? For professionals who are buying the software every year anyway, then no. In many ways is makes it easier. Much like buying your apps on the Mac App store makes it easier to reinstall your software on a new machine. For them $600 to have access to all those apps is the cost of doing business, already baked in. I pay about $150 for each annual version of Lightroom alone (now included in the Creative Cloud). I could argue that I certainly use Photoshop and a few of the other apps enough to justify $1.65 a day. I spend more than that on egg sandwiches. And the apps are still best of breed and remain up to date. As a bonus, Adobe is trying to smooth over their customers by offering the first year for $29/mo for current Creative Suite users. There is also a $20/mo for students and teachers.

The real people who are going to lose our are the hobbyists. The serious amateur photographer who likes to buy Photoshop for $600 and then use it for 6 years on their G5 tower. Or the gal who uses only Photoshop. Now they’ll have to pony up and pay the $20/mo for the single app (you can buy them one at a time if you only use one or two). So $240 per year for Photoshop, which is more than the $199 every 18 months that current upgrades cost.

Personally as someone who has been around computers for 30 years, I don’t like the idea of software as a service. There’s something unsettling about it. I like buying a piece of software and knowing that I can install it and use it for years without paying the company another cent. It’s ‘mine’ even though I know it’s only a license.

I’ll admit that when I first read the news I had that ‘ut oh’ sinking feeling. However it’s a brave new world and I don’t think any amount of grumbling and shaking of fists is going to turn back the hands of time. Maybe I can use my current status as an SVA Thesis Advisor to sign up for the discount…